more observations

ancestral connections to soil is a piss poor reason to allow or disallow someone into a country. comparing yourself by things you have no control in seems like a fools game.

america is a country of immigrants, not of germans... get it right. if there is such a thing as an american nationalist party, its one that would include every shade and variant of immigrant.

while people look at the marjuana smokers as something insideous, if you look at the reasons for places like the netherlands, china and japan having low rates of use... its probably due to extremely controlling families... and people who feel duty to their family, their ethnicity, their skin color, their race... their ancestors... essentially they're pulled between many directions and in the end can't move in any... whereas in america... we don't have such views as a whole... its weird. i think conservative control isnt much better than liberal mistake.

amazingly... at 21 about 50 percent of kids in america have reported using weed, and nearly 20 percent have reported using cocaine. some people like to point out the counterbalance of strictness in some european countries being the reason nothing has gone awry in those countries.

strangely enough i find alot of similarities between myself and the germanic folks on the german-oriented ancestry forums... perhaps thats a similar thing found in indian culture... but strangely enough yes there's startling similarities in the way i AND my parents think and these posters on the german ancestry forums. in a way its giving me a chance to look in the mirror, and see something of myself in it... for the first time... by reading the sentiments of these people.

its ironic that some of the most vocal germans are those with impure blood, notably a man saying he had a drop of native american in his veins, and people responded saying they could kick him off if they please. yet he comes back for more, even though scorned by his own forum. and nobody rushing to his defence. amazing.

why such a focus on the children of interracial marriage? race itself is just such a stupid thing. its just skin color, a bit of biological genetic difference, amounting to perhaps a horse breed... but defining your identity as a person by your breed as a person... seems a rather hollow place to hide... why not strike out and let something more daring be that which identifies you. instead these people seem to remain incubated within their own... self-protectionist nature of "my race" "my ancestors" and pointing out who is and who isnt to be involved with them. as if masses of people around the world band up by race... no... most dont. because unlike you, few people believe fleshy skin to be a worthy ideological point of union.

another thing, the ... hatred by self-identifying-white men with regards to identified-white women and their choice to sleep with identified-black men. this seems such a rediculous state of affairs. how can a SI-white man called a I-white woman anything... when they just are not related whatsoever.

these people talking about how scummy folks are for being in interracial relationships... what fucking idiots... there is nothing wrong with HUMANS being in a relationship. eugenics brought about WW2 and the holocaust. travesties of mankind.

heh these guys come across as viking nerds.

interesting, so when you see how these people think, when they discuss sikhs specifically, you can see how there are parts of our belief system that are entirely familiar to them as they are also part of their own .the sense that sikhs are warriors, were the strongest picked out in a time of war, have a legacy of some sort of selection, strong genes being taken forth and being made into sikhs... very similar to the aryan / german notions of racial purity and the like, and controlling who mates with whom.

absolutely rediculous... calling homosexuality a sin in sikhism... just as cutting hair is a sin... are you kidding me? it's not even a sin to begin with. that's a christian term. not even inherent in our texts. wake the fuck up.

and then this whole god's design thing... kinda rediculous.

i didnt even know there were sikhs out there who were opposed to homosexuality, but then i guess it makes sense. those who believe in natural law, those are the folks who think that whatever is inherently meant for by design in nature is what is law, and any thoughtful choice to overcome or go against that natural law is a perversion / sin / whathaveyou and therefore is wrong and unjust, unwanted, perhaps dark and destructive in some way. but yeah, some sikhs seem to believe in this notion of natural law. me, i don't. but some seem to. seems weird as fuck. but at the same time, it's very similar, in fact the exact same belief that some of these white-power groups hold true, they believe that the white race must be maintained, that miscegnation (interratial children) are again against natural law... its all that shit... basically conservatism where they hinge more on the past than present. living their lives in pattern rather than in a real motion of individuality. free thought and free will should be celebrated, not withheld. live virtuously, but not behind bars. these views are just plain terrible.