i dont think the problem is with people disagreeing with things, becuase that'll happen, but rather the way people act in accordance with this disagreement. some use jokes, laugh it off, continue. others muse, but then let it go, and continue. but there's a small subsection that seems to fixate on it, become furiously enraged, and then in that rage... more or less becomes capable of committing crimes in order to more or less get their way on the issue. but the problem is their issue becomes obscured by their crime, and no change will come about if they are labeled as murderer and not idealist. tough luck.
there are more options that just simply deciding not to work together to create a situation where all parties can feel comfortable. and to say someone has a country of their own is a bit strange... say for isntance with the sikhs... their ancestral lands are split between two countries, one which is overtly anti-sikh, the other being passively anti-sikh. there is no country for the sikhs, so simply citing "return to it" is a meaningless line of drivel for such people.
"invading the lands of my people" what a backward point of view, with regards to immigrants, when speaking of well known colonialized countries... australia for instance... was once white-minority. america... white minority... etc... and then if you go far back, i would venture to say that if all life came from africa... then basically all the europeans trying to lay ancestral claim to europe are rediculous. they were just the first to get there, but before them, was nothing. and even if they got there, those who did get there may not have even been white-looking, or otherwise identifiable european types. its just too much of a stretch to try and lay claim to those humans that did occupy those lands as being default-europeans. there's been much migration, warfare, death, and various groups have come in, intermingled, and settled. the so called "white race" is also a hybrid of its predecessors. ignorance of your own origin is a bit much with regards to "acestral claims".
and "belong in the country of their origin" crap... why is this now an impetus for mankind today? we did not impose such limits on ourselves in past eons. why now? and who affords such power to you to control where a person goes and why. noone. its an overextended reach of a silly idea that deserves little attention and has little merit.
and then ruining the racial composition of a country... why the hell does it matter what race your country is composed of hah. absolutely rediculous.
Friday, August 21, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
stuff 'bout the topic at hand
- interesting positive slant on apu
- US v Bhagat Singh Thind
- turban tide
- indian americans on the census
- about proselytizing (inciting conversion)
- manmohan's role in india's current boom from '91 to present day
- the dominating force in india for years
- solid info sight bout sikhism
- descendant of the last sikh king of punjab
- indian americans wiki
No comments:
Post a Comment