Tuesday, December 15, 2009

airport stares

is menacing staring considered harassment
- intentional infliction of emotional distress
- more of a workplace crime
- dignity of work
- shattered by exploitation and mistreatment


http://www.errtravel.com/archive/20060127.htm - about staring

Here’s how it works. Except for narcissists, people generally feel uncomfortable when they are the object of sustained attention. They feel they are being scrutinized, which of course they are. That discomfort creates anxiety, and to relieve the anxiety, a person will likely change whatever miserable thing he is doing. He changes his behavior, and the stare ceases; his anxiety is relieved, and you’ve accomplished your objective. It’s a win-win situation.


http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/meridians/v004/4.1hai.html

"I hear so many familiar sub-texts burgeoning behind that question that a tart reply forms itself and leaves my tongue before I have fully processed either the situation or the wisdom of my answer. Underlying his question is first the obvious patriotic guilt-trip: why have you abandoned the soil [End Page 145] that nurtured you, to give of your learning to others, to that Western nation already saturated with brain power? Why not stay here where our need is greater? Implicit in it is also the woman guilt-trip: why are you not at home with your parents, serving family, community, nation—above and beyond your self? How can you live there, a woman alone, incomplete, unsheltered by a husband? The daughterly guilt trip: you should stay at home as is proper—for you are after all property—until you have been appropriately disposed of by parental agency into husbandly hands, instead of remaining that unspeakable burden, the unmarried daughter, undutifully obstructing your parents' function in life, which is to be relieved of you. Much remains unsaid on my part too, that must perforce remain unsaid. His desire for random exchange is incommensurate with my impulse to round on him with all the collected detritus of my years of struggle against familial and societal demands. Was he really prepared to hear my answer?
"

this kindof makes me worried to ever study these kinds of things for fear of perhaps just thinking of them as static concepts and not anything that directly effect me. it seems she's a well studied feminist. these're classes i'm looking at with interest in CCSF.

also feminism seems more a source of anger for this person than a source of enlightenment that provides perhaps a sense of peace of mind, morseo just entrance to a whole new battleground that perhaps she felt she wasn't aware of before.

"An old trap, pitting devotion and self-sacrifice against self-interest"


nice.

"Yet, as the oldest daughter, I still carried the pain of knowing that because of my insistence on shaping my own life, and [End Page 148] because of my refusal to subordinate my intellectual self to the cultural expectation of marriage and progeny, my parents had been regularly mocked and humiliated for failing to control and appropriately dispose of me. My eventual "late" marriage to a non-Pakistani of my own choosing—my husband is a British national, of mixed European and South Asian descent—was still culturally coded as an embarrassment to which my suffering parents had had to reconcile themselves."


interesting.

"that a culture and country that did not treat its women with much respect should presume to demand that those very women return and devote themselves to a self-sacrificing patriotism. "


"For what had been bothering me throughout, I realized, was ultimately a matter of respect, or rather, of suffering continuous disrespect as a wom-an. I became aware of it the moment I arrived in Pakistan—it would descend upon me like a weight in the air, that subtle aura of dismissive-ness, that expectation that I must humble myself, and retreat to my proper "place." "


you know this makes me think that perhaps this sort of thing seems to sort of lead towards a comparison between her treatment there and my treatment here. i would almost say that i get the same sort of treatment here as she does there. exactly so, really. it's kindof strange and sad really.

"And yet inevitably, as is the case with family reunions, old histories and unresolved tension points created minefields amidst the celebration."


this's rediculously awesome

http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/meridians/v004/4.1hai.html

check it out.

Thursday, December 3, 2009

the young turks

"can you tell how scared they are on this? why do you keep screaming?"

"this is why the republican party is a joke. its like theyre not aware of their own hypocricies."

"its important that you analyze obama speeches in the light of day... you get a little tipsy on obama speech making. you have to go over the speech again to make sure you got everything... you have to dive in to see what he's actually saying."

"they are so insecure about morality that they want to enforce morality one everyone."

_______________________

racialicious

i don’t really agree with this. first of all the movie companies are based in america. secondly its hard enough to get skin color in roles. to expect the actors to be from the country of the character is a bit much. there is such thing as acting. it means theyre putting it all on for show. if you cast an actual barber as a barber where’s the acting? bottom line is american movies are probably likely to have an all american cast. consider the audience theyre trying to sell the film too. plus the fact that the same ten actors act in every hollywood blockbuster. the bottom line is that there’s no direct tie between africa in hollywood. if there was then you might see more crossover. actors local to the region. as well as directors and film crew. as it is they’re based in america and they feature mainly americans. if africans are bothered by it they should start their own film industry local. look at the indian system. an indian actor in an american film is a hard sell. but if you go to india there’s a big industry for indian film. plus america itself is deeply prejudiced. i’d say save yourself the trouble and start something in a more african friendly environment. bottom line is the most you can expect is for an actor to look like the guy. at least when it comes to cinema. if you want real quality acting go to the stage.

http://www.racialicious.com/2009/12/03/casting-white-actors-in-asian-roles-1957-to-today/#more-4545

it seems like when it comes to race we’re really far behind in film. i’m actually surprised things are so bad so recent. my question is is there any tendency to rewrite non-asian roles as asian? it might just be that we’re jumping the gun. with there being so few asians in america perhaps there arent enough actors for the role. there’s only so many movies jon cho can do.

but i have to admit it does look bad. its hard not to look at those charicatured roles. asian characters distinctly played by whites. perhaps by erasing the asian role altogether they save face. but when seen against the backdrop of the history you can see where its coming from. and its not a good place.

http://www.racialicious.com/2009/12/03/casting-white-actors-in-asian-roles-1957-to-today/#comment-2048918

i’d just like to say this is a brilliant article. and it echoes alot of my own personal beliefs.

http://www.racialicious.com/2009/11/30/no-one-hijacked-islam/#comment-2048922

Followers